<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detachment, love, imperfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/saintliness-love-and-drunkeness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/saintliness-love-and-drunkeness/</link>
	<description>musings about mountain living, book reading, wiki whatnots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cdccdc</title>
		<link>http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/saintliness-love-and-drunkeness/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>cdccdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Ahh, yes, we must draw a line between deprivation and non-attachment, I suppose... Enjoyment is not, entirely, for the ego anyway, is it? Personal happiness, in some way, contributes to the greater good... And so, we&#039;re back to beer again. No idea about Kant, but... why not? Hurray for a nibble of self-serving philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, yes, we must draw a line between deprivation and non-attachment, I suppose&#8230; Enjoyment is not, entirely, for the ego anyway, is it? Personal happiness, in some way, contributes to the greater good&#8230; And so, we&#8217;re back to beer again. No idea about Kant, but&#8230; why not? Hurray for a nibble of self-serving philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/saintliness-love-and-drunkeness/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crayoncandyjar.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Gandhi&#039;s non-attachment certainly seems to be an extreme form, at least as Orwell depicts it. I guess I don&#039;t think practicing non-attachment for the good of yourself or the world *must* result in asceticism. There&#039;s always the Buddhist injunction to take the middle way. And yeah ... was it Kant who proved that beer is a moral good? I know someone did ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Gandhi&#8217;s non-attachment certainly seems to be an extreme form, at least as Orwell depicts it. I guess I don&#8217;t think practicing non-attachment for the good of yourself or the world *must* result in asceticism. There&#8217;s always the Buddhist injunction to take the middle way. And yeah &#8230; was it Kant who proved that beer is a moral good? I know someone did &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
